Monday, September 23, 2013

Lottery

Gawker recently reported that an ex-crack addict had been swindled out of a $5 million lottery payment several years ago; the state lottery board tracked him down to make it right. The man was given the option between a lump sum payment of $2.1 million after taxes, or $250,000 annually for the next 20 years.

I surveyed my friends to see which option they'd take.

Grad Student living on a stipend: I think I would get paid out in the allotments because I'm boring. I just think I would like to receive a S--- ton of money every year. It'd be like winning the lottery for the rest of my life!

Co-worker with a semi-crippling shoe addiction: I REALLY wanna take it all in the lump sum. I just really, really, really do. I can't help it.

Boyfran with a left brain the size of Texas: Lump sum FOR SURE. You never know how much taxes or inflation will affect the annuity in the future, so you go for one payout. Then you invest the lump sum wisely so it ends up being even more than the $5 million you originally won.

Me: There is no way on earth I'd be able to take the annuity. In fact, make sure I have a good financial planner who advises me against getting my lump sum in gold coins or I WILL live out my childhood DuckTales fantasy.



Co-worker: F-that, we're going swimming!

Boyfran: Fine, we'll dive into our money and THEN invest it.

That's what you call a win-win. Here's a fantastic and hilarious article on how you would actually recreate the Scrooge McDuck Gold Dive in real life.

Related Posts:

  • Coffeeshop convosTwo weeks ago, I worked remotely in San Francisco, which was an all-around delightful experience. The only real issue is that I ended up having to work longer hours than expected because of coffeeshop convos. C is for coffee… Read More
  • BarrierWe have an old and not-very-funny joke in Minnesota that goes something like this: "How many seasons are there?" "Two: winter and road construction." Go ahead and take a minute to compose yourself after that knee-sla… Read More
  • DecisiveI've mentioned before that coaching a dance team was the best thing that ever happened to me, from a decision-making standpoint. There's no pressure quite like the one you feel when 30+ teenage girls are staring at you waitin… Read More
  • Emilio EstevezJeff and his college buddies have a thing where they tell jokes about Emilio Estevez. It's nearly impossible to explain, so here's an example. What do you call Emilio Estevez when he gets a job as a stock broker?   &nb… Read More
  • AdventShould I really say I'll participate in this blogging challenge? I've had a bad track record over the last two years, and I worry that my good blogging pals KC, LH MM, Et al. have had enough of my shenanigans. Stil… Read More

3 comments:

mm said...

Annually of course!

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

That's some interesting news. At least the state board made the effort to track him and make it up for his swindled winnings. Looking at the list of responses in your post, there's a good argument both for and against having a lump sum payout. I guess most people equate having a lump sum payout as spending it all away in indulgence. But as your boyfriend pointed out, it may actually be the smarter option to do. And my two cents on your response. If you don't feel like having enough self-control not to spend it straightaway, you can hire a financial counselor for that as well.

Granoff Enterprises